IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.02.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN
W.P.No.4005 of 2017
1.V.Sivarama Krishnan
2.V.Elangovan
3.G.Malarvizhi
4.C.Subramanyam
5.M.A.Balakrishnan
6.P.Viswanathan
7.S.Radhakrishnan
8.R.Ekambaram
9.Pramila Chandrasekhar
10.V.Vijayakrishnan
11.R.Selvakumar
12.Usha Swaminathan
13.N.Mathivathanan
14.John Newton Jeyaraj
15.C.Madhavan
16.L.Jothi Narayana Prasad
17.M.Banumathi
18.N.Devasena
19.B.Indira
20.Ramasamy
21.Usha Kiran
22.Loganthan
23.Suguna Devi
24.P.Kumaravelu
25.S.Jagannathan
26.V.Muralidharan
27.Rajendran
28.S.Tamilselvan
29.S.M.Gangadharan
30.V.Visalakshi ... Petitioners
Vs.
1.The General Manager (Personnel),
Personnel Department,
Syndicate Bank,
Head Office Manipal,
PIN 576 119.
2.The General Manager (Personnel),
Office of the Managing Director/CEO,
Corporate Office, Syndicate Bank,
Gandhi Nagar, Bangalore 560 009. ... Respondents
Writ
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying
for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to dispose
of the petitioners representations dated 09.12.2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ilamvaludhi
O R D E R
This
Court, taking into consideration the limited scope of the prayer in the
Writ Petition, is inclined to dispose of it at the admission stage
itself.
2.The
petitioners are former employees of the Syndicate Bank/ respondents and
claim to have put in service of 32 to 40 years and they have been
sanctioned with basic pension according to their pay scale at the time
of retirement and it was never revised after 1993.
3.Mr.S.Ilamvaludhi,
learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the
residuary provisions of the Pension Regulation Scheme 1993 of the
employees of the Syndicate Bank are similar and on par with the
employees of the Central Government and the Central Government
retirement and pension rules are also applicable to the retired
Syndicate Bank employees also. It is further submitted by the learned
counsel appearing for the petitioners that in this regard, the
petitioners have submitted a joint representation dated 09.12.2016 to
the 1st respondent and despite receipt and acknowledgment, so far no
orders have been passed and therefore, came forward to file this Writ
Petition.
4.This
Court, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for by the
petitioner and without going into the merits of the claim projected by
the petitioners, directs the 1st respondent to consider and dispose of
the petitioners' joint representation dated 09.12.2016, on merits and in
accordance with law and pass orders within a period of twelve (12)
weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate
the decision taken, to the petitioners.
5.The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
Index : No 17.02.2017
Internet : Yes
va
To
1.The General Manager (Personnel),
Personnel Department,
Syndicate Bank,
Head Office Manipal,
PIN 576 119.
2.The General Manager (Personnel),
Office of the Managing Director/CEO,
Corporate Office, Syndicate Bank,
Gandhi Nagar, Bangalore 560 009.
No comments:
Post a Comment